Behavioral change theories and models

Behavioral change theories and models are attempts to explain the reasons behind alterations in individuals' behavioral patterns. These theories cite environmental, personal, and behavioral characteristics as the major factors in behavioral determination. In recent years, there has been increased interest in the application of these theories in the areas of health, education, and criminology with the hope that understanding behavioral change will improve the services offered in these areas.

History

Many of the original works outlining the major theories that are the basis for current knowledge about behavioral change theories were published in the 1970s and 1980s. These include Icek Ajzen%u2019s articles on the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior, Albert Bandura%u2019s writings on Social Cognitive Theory, and James Prochaska and Carlo DiClemente%u2019s works on the Transtheoretical Model. More recently, interest in behavioral change theories has arisen due to their apparent application in areas like health, education, and criminology, leading to further research backed by institutions like the National Institutes of Health. With this renewed interest, however, there is also a shift towards research into understanding the maintenance of behavioral change in addition to broadening the research base for revising current theories that focus on initial change (NIH 2003).

General theories and models

Each behavioral change theory or model focuses on different factors in attempting to explain behavioral change. Of the many that exist, the most prevalent are the Learning Theories, Social Learning Theory, Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior, and Transtheoretical Model. Research has also been conducted regarding specific elements of these theories, especially elements like self-efficacy that are common to several of the theories (Ajzen 1985).

Self-Efficacy

Self-efficacy is an individual%u2019s impression of their own ability to perform a task. This impression is based upon factors like the individual%u2019s prior success in the task or in related tasks, the individual%u2019s physiological state, and outside sources of persuasion (Bandura 1977). Self-efficacy is thought to be predictive of the amount of effort an individual will expend in initiating and maintaining a behavioral change, so although self-efficacy is not a behavioral change theory per se, it is an important element of many of the theories, including the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior (Bandura 1977 and USDHHS 1996).

Learning Theories/Behavior Analytic Theories of Change

From behaviorists like Burrhus Frederic Skinner come the Learning Theories, which state that complex behavior is learned gradually through the modification of simpler behaviors (USDHHS 1996). Imitation and reinforcement play important roles in these theories, which state that individuals learn by duplicating behaviors they observe in others and that rewards are essential to ensuring the repetition of desirable behavior (Skinner 1953). As each simple behavior is established through imitation and subsequent reinforcement, the complex behavior develops. When verbal behavior is established the organism can learn through rule governed behavior and thus not all action needs to be contingency shaped.

Skinner (1957) was one of the first psychologists to recognize the critical role of imitation (what he termed echoic behavior) in the learning of language.^[1]. Behavior analytic theories of change have been quite effective in improving the human condition (see behavior modification, behavior therapy and applied behavior analysis).

Social Learning/Social Cognitive Theory

According to the Social Learning Theory, which is also known as the Social Cognitive Theory, behavioral change is determined by environmental, personal, and behavioral elements. Each factor affects each of the others. For example, in congruence with the principles of self-efficacy, an individual%u2019s thoughts affect their behavior and an individual%u2019s characteristics elicit certain responses from the social environment. Likewise, an individual%u2019s environment affects the development of personal characteristics as well as the person%u2019s behavior, and an individual%u2019s behavior may change their environment as well as the way the individual thinks or feels. Social Learning Theory focuses on the reciprocal interactions between these factors, which are hypothesized to determine behavioral change (Bandura 1989).

Theory of Reasoned Action

The Theory of Reasoned Action assumes that individuals consider a behavior%u2019s consequences before performing the particular behavior. As a result, intention is an important factor in determining behavior and behavioral change. According to Icek Ajzen (1985), intentions develop from an individual%u2019s perception of a behavior as positive or negative together with the individual%u2019s impression of the way their society perceives the same behavior. Thus, personal attitude and social pressure shape intention, which is essential to performance of a behavior and consequently behavioral change (Ajzen 1985).

Theory of Planned Behavior

In 1985, Ajzen expanded upon the Theory of Reasoned Action, formulating the Theory of Planned Behavior, which also emphasizes the role of intention in behavior performance but is intended to cover cases in which a person is not in control of all factors affecting the actual performance of a behavior. As a result, the new theory states that the incidence of actual behavior performance is proportional to the amount of control an individual possesses over the behavior and the strength of the individual%u2019s intention in performing the behavior. In his article, Ajzen (1985) further hypothesizes that self-efficacy is important in determining the strength of the individual%u2019s intention to perform a behavior.

Transtheoretical/Stages of Change Model

According to the Transtheoretical Model, which is also known as the Stages of Change Model, behavioral change is a five-step process. The five stages, between which individuals may oscillate before achieving complete change, are precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance (USDHHS 1996). At the precontemplation stage, an individual may or may not be aware of a problem but has no thought of changing their behavior. From precontemplation to contemplation, the individual develops a desire to change a behavior. During preparation, the individual intends to change the behavior within the next month, and during the action stage, the individual begins to exhibit new behavior consistently. An individual finally enters the maintenance stage once they exhibit the new behavior consistently for over six months (%u201CBehavior Change%u201D 2007).

Applications

Behavioral change theories have potential applications in many areas. Prominent areas of application include healthcare, education, and criminal behavior. These issues are important to societal functionality and policy-making, resulting in recent renewed interest in these theories.

Health

In the interest of promoting healthy lifestyle development, behavioral change theories have gained recognition for their possible effectiveness in explaining health-related behaviors and providing insight into methods that would encourage individuals to develop and maintain healthy lifestyles. Specific health applications of behavioral change theories include the development of programs promoting active lifestyles and programs reducing the spread of diseases like AIDS (USDHHS 1996 and %u201CBehavior Change%u201D 2007). In addition, the National Institutes of Health has, in recent years, funded research to broaden the information base for behavioral change theories (NIH 2003).

Models specific to health applications include the Health Belief/Health Action Model and Relapse Prevention Model. The Health Belief Model, also known as the Health Action Model, states that individuals will alter health-related behavior according to the perceived severity of the threat to their health (Chen & Land 1986). The Relapse Prevention Model concentrates on promoting prolonged healthy behavior by making distinctions between lapses and relapses in an attempt to encourage individuals to maintain healthy lifestyles (USDHHS 1996).

Education

Behavioral change theories can be used as guides in developing effective teaching methods. Since the goal of much education is behavioral change, the understanding of behavior afforded by behavioral change theories provides insight into the formulation of effective teaching methods that tap into the mechanisms of behavioral change. In an era when education programs strive to reach large audiences with varying socioeconomic statuses, the designers of such programs increasingly strive to understand the reasons behind behavioral change in order to understand universal characteristics that may be crucial to program design (Nutbeam 2000).

In fact, some of the theories, like the Social Learning Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior, were developed as attempts to improve health education. Because these theories address the interaction between individuals and their environments, they can provide insight into the effectiveness of education programs given a specific set of predetermined conditions, like the social context in which a program will be initiated (Nutbeam 2000). Although health education is still the area in which behavioral change theories are most often applied, theories like the Stages of Change Model have begun to be applied in other areas like employee training and developing systems of higher education (Government 2007 and Elton 2003).

Criminology

Empirical studies in criminology support behavioral change theories. At the same time, the general theories of behavioral change suggest possible explanations to criminal behavior and methods of correcting deviant behavior (Akers 1979). Since deviant behavior correction entails behavioral change, understanding of behavioral change can facilitate the adoption of effective correctional methods in policy-making. For example, the understanding that deviant behavior like stealing may be learned behavior resulting from reinforcers like hunger satisfaction that are unrelated to criminal behavior can aid the development of social controls that address this underlying issue rather than merely the resultant behavior (Jeffery 1965).

Specific theories that have been applied to criminology include the Social Learning and Differential Association Theories. Social Learning Theory%u2019s element of interaction between an individual and their environment explains the development of deviant behavior as a function of an individual%u2019s exposure to a certain behavior and their acquaintances, who can reinforce either socially acceptable or socially unacceptable behavior (Akers 1979). Differential Association Theory, originally formulated by Edwin Sutherland, is a popular, related theoretical explanation of criminal behavior that applies learning theory concepts and asserts that deviant behavior is learned behavior. Jeffery%u2019s (1965) reexamination of Sutherland%u2019s original theory adds that because of the necessity of temporal proximity between punishment and behavior for conditioning to occur, the legal system%u2019s application of punishment is more likely to generate law evasion rather than to correct deviant behavior.

Objections

Behavioral change theories are not universally accepted. Criticisms include the theories%u2019 emphases on individual behavior and a general disregard for the influence of environmental factors on behavior. In addition, as some theories were formulated as guides to understanding behavior while others were designed as frameworks for behavioral interventions, the theories%u2019 purposes are not consistent (USDHHS 1996). Such criticism illuminates the strengths and weaknesses of the theories, showing that there is room for further research into behavioral change theories (NIH 2003).

See Also

• Behaviour modification
• Behavioural Intention awareness
• Behaviourism
• Health Belief Model
• Technology acceptance model
• Theory of planned behaviour
• Theory of reasoned action

• Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11- 39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Retrieved November 1, 2007, from http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/publications.html Icek Ajzen Selected Publications.

• Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L. & Radosevich, M. (August 1979). Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: A Specific Test of a General Theory. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 636-655. Retrieved October 31, 2007, from http://www.jstor.org/view/00031224/di974330/97p0630q/0 JSTOR.

• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. Retrieved October 31, 2007, from http://www.kk.org/quantifiedself/Bandura%20(1977)%20Self-Efficacy.pdf Kevin Kelly Home.

• Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development (pp. 1-60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Retrieved October 31, 2007, from http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/Bandura1989ACD.pdf Emory University Division of Educational Studies.

• "Behavior Change -- A Summary of Four Major Theories." Family Health International. 16 Nov. 2007. <http://www.fhi.org/NR/rdonlyres/ei26vbslpsidmahhxc332vwo3g233xsqw22er3vofqvrfjvubwyzclvqjcbdgexyzl3msu4mn6xv5j/BCCSummaryFourMajorTheories.pdf>.

• Chen, M. & Land, K. C. (1986). Testing the Health Belief Model: LISREL Analysis of Alternative Models of Causal Relationships Between Health Beliefs and Preventive Dental Behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49(1), 45-60. Retrieved October 31, 2007, from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0190-2725(198603)49%3A1%3C45%3ATTHBML%3E2.0.CO%3B2-J JSTOR.

• Elton, L. (2003). Dissemination of Innovations in Higher Education. Tertiary Education and Management, (9), 199-214. Retrieved December 4, 2007, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/l77k54wg45946125/fulltext.pdf SpringerLink.

• Government of South Australia. %u201CBehaviour Change Tools for Workplace Recycling%u201D Retrieved December 3, 2007, from http://www.zerowaste.sa.gov.au/greening_government/pdf/BehaviourChange.doc Zero Waste South Australia.

• Jeffery, C. R. (September 1965). Criminal Behavior and Learning Theory. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 56(3), 294-300. Retrieved December 4, 2007, from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=00220205%28196509%2956%3A3%3C294%3ACBALT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-4 JSTOR.

• NIH Guide. (2003, January 13). Maintenance of Long Term Behavioral Change. Retrieved October 31, 2007, from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-OB-03-003.html.

• Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 15(3), 259-267. Retrieved November 15, 2007, from http://heapro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/15/3/259 Oxford Journals.

• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Free Press. Retrieved October 17, 2007, from http://www.bfskinner.org/SHBtext.pdf Google Scholar.

• U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. (1996). Understanding and Promoting Physical Activity. In Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General (pp. 211-215). Atlanta, GA: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Retrieved October 17, 2007, from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/sgr/chap6.htm United States Department of Health and Human Services.