Health care politics

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged into Health care reform. (Discuss)

Health care often accounts for one of the largest areas of spending for both governments and individuals all over the world, and as such it is surrounded by controversy. Though there are many topics involved in health care politics, most can be categorized as either philosophical or economic. Philosophical debates center around questions about individual rights and government authority while economic topics include how to maximize the quality of health care and minimize costs.

Background

The modern concept of health care involves access to medical professionals from various fields as well as medical technologies such as medication and surgical techniques. One way that a person gains access to these goods and services is by paying for them. Now, many governments around the world have established universal health care, which essentially puts every person in a country on the same level of access.

Philosophy

Further information: Philosophy of Healthcare

Right to Health Care

The United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights asserts that medical care is a right of all people. Many religions also impose an obligation on their followers to care for those in less favourable circumstances, including the sick. Humanists too would assert the same obligation and the right has been enshrined in many other ways too.^[1] ^[2]

An opposing school of thought rejects this notion.^[3] They (laissez-faire capitalists for example) assert that providing health care funded by taxes is immoral because it is a form of legalized robbery, denying the right to dispose of one's own income at one's own will. They assert that doctors should not be servants of their patients but rather they should be regarded as traders, like everyone else in a free society."^[4]

Government Regulation

A second question concerns the effect government involvement would have. One concern is that the right to privacy between doctors and patients could be eroded if governments demand power to oversee health of citizens.^[5] In practice, this does not happen to any significant extend.

Another concern is that governments use legislation to control personal freedoms. For example, some Canadian provinces have outlawed private medical insurance from competing with the national social insurance systems for basic health care to ensure fair allocation of national resources irrespective of personal wealth. Laissez-faire supporters argue that this blocks a fundamental freedom to use one's own purchasing power at will. ^[6]

Controlling the Industry

When a government controls the health care industry, they essentially mandate what health care everyone will get and use wealth redistribution to finance it, as with any tax.

Universal health care requires government involvement and oversight.

Economics

Impact on quality of health care

One question that is often brought up is whether socialized medicine provides better or worse quality health care than privatized medicine. There are many arguments on both sides of the issue.

Arguments which see socialized health care as improving the quality of health care:

For those people who would otherwise go without care, any quality care is an improvement.^{[citation needed]}
Since people perceive universal health care as free, they are more likely to seek preventative care which makes them better off in the long run.^[7]
Death rates are lower under socialized systems.^[8]

Arguments which see socialized health care as worsening the quality of health care:

It slows down innovation and inhibits new technologies from being developed and utilized. This simply means that medical technologies are less likely to be researched and manufactured, and technologies that are available are less likely to be used.^[9]
Free healthcare can lead to overuse of medical services, and hence raise overall cost.^[10] ^[11]
Socialized medicine leads to greater inefficiencies and inequalities. ^[12]^[3]^[13]
Uninsured citizens can simply pay for their health care. Even indigent citizens can still receive emergency care from alternative sources such as non-profit organizations.^{[citation needed]} Some providers may be required to provide some emergency services regardless of insured status or ability to pay, as with the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act in the United States.

Impact on medical professionals

Proponents of universal health care contend that universal health care reduces the amount of paperwork that medical professionals have to deal with, allowing them to concentrate on treating patients.

Opponents argue that government-mandated procedures reduce doctor flexibility. This, along with the loss of private practice options and possible reduced pay dissuades many would-be doctors from pursuing the profession.^{[citation needed]}

Impact on Medical Research

Those in favor of universal health care posit that removing profit as a motive will increase the rate of medical innovation.^[14] Those opposed argue that it will do the opposite, for the same reason.^[13]

Economic Impact

Universal health care affects economies differently than private health care.

Those in favor of universal health care contend that it reduces wastefulness in the delivery of health care by adding a middle man, the government, to regulate the supply of health care.^{[citation needed]} For example, it might only take one government agent to do the job of two health insurance agents.^[15]

One of the biggest criticisms of socialized medicine is that it suffers from the same financial problems as any other government planned economy. Not only does it require governments to greatly increase taxes, it requires more and more money each year. Essentially, universal health care tries to do the economically impossible.^[16]

Government agencies are less efficient due to bureaucracy.^{[citation needed]}^[12] Administrative duties, by doctors, are the result of medical centralization and over-regulation, and are not natural to the profession.^{[citation needed]} In fact, before heavy regulation of the health care and insurance industries, doctor visits to the elderly, and free care, or low cost care to impoverished patients was common; governments regulated this form of charity out of existence.^[17] Universal health care plans will add more inefficiency to the medical system because of more bureaucratic oversight and more paperwork, which will lead to less doctor patient visits.^[18]

Profit motives, competition, and individual ingenuity lead to greater cost control and effectiveness.^{[citation needed]}

Healthy people who take care of themselves have to pay for the burden of those who smoke, are obese, etc.^{[citation needed]}

Empirical evidence on single payer insurance programs demonstrates that the cost exceeds the expectations of advocates.^[19]

Means

Many forms of universal health care have been proposed. These include mandatory health insurance requirements, complete capitalization of health care, and single payer systems among others.^[20]